The institution of waqf—a permanent dedication of property for religious, charitable, or socially beneficial purposes—has historically served as a vital instrument of Islamic philanthropy in India. From its institutionalization during the Abbasid Caliphate to its consolidation under the Mughal Empire, waqf evolved as both a religious and socio-economic mechanism. Colonial codification through the Waqf Validating Acts of 1913 and 1930 and post-independence legislation, including the Waqf Acts of 1954 and 1995, sought to regulate and preserve waqf assets. The 2025 amendment, now termed the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development (UMEED) Act, 1995, marks a significant shift by mandating inclusivity, digital accountability, and professional oversight. While the government justifies these reforms as transparency-oriented, critics argue they dilute religious autonomy and infringe upon fundamental rights under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. The pending constitutional review before the Supreme Court will determine whether the reforms represent legitimate secular governance or unconstitutional interference in minority religious administration. This paper examines the historical evolution, legislative trajectory, and constitutional implications of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, situating it within India’s broader jurisprudence on religious freedom, equality, and institutional accountability.